The Department of the Treasury will recognize claims
by States for payment of United States securities where the States have
actually succeeded to the title and ownership of the securities pursuant
to valid escheat proceedings. The Department, however, does not recognize
claims for payment by a State acting merely as custodian of unclaimed or
abandoned securities and not as successor in title and ownership of the
securities.
In other words, the Treasury recognizes escheat statutes that provide that
a State has succeeded to the legal ownership of securities because in such
case payment of the securities results in full discharge of the Treasury's
obligation and this discharge is valid in all jurisdictions.
On the other hand, payment of securities to a State claiming only as a
custodian results in the substitution of one obligor, the Department of the
Treasury, for another, the State. Not only is there serious question whether
there is authority for a State to effect such a substitution, but there
seems to be no basis for believing that payment to a State custodian would
effectively discharge Treasury of its obligation. Even if the discharge
were claimed effective in the State to which the payment is made, it is
believed that the Treasury's obligation and liability would still remain
in force in all other jurisdictions.
Return to Main Menu for Savings Bonds